Skip to Content
Local News

The Myth of Placemaking: A Lesson for Minneapolis

This rendering from the Downtown Council’s Vision 2035 Plan employs a common but misleading placemaking technique to market visions through emotional appeal. It depicts an artificially vibrant streetscape with unrealistic flower gardens along public sidewalks, off-leash dogs, a biking density reminiscent of Amsterdam and a variety of people enjoying a perfect afternoon. However, such a scene is unlikely to materialize without addressing key realities, such as convenient parking, ample clean restrooms and enhanced safety. (Image: Minneapolis Downtown Council)

It’s virtually impossible to study urban planning these days without taking courses on placemaking. And the founder of the placemaking movement is a name most of us in the community revitalization business would recognize: Fred Kent.

Fred Kent is a friend of mine, and Fred, despite his curmudgeonly personality, has had a major impact on cities around the globe, or as one brochure puts it, from “Bologna to Buffalo.” In fact, for those unacquainted with the world of placemaking, here is a brief (well maybe, not so brief) explanation of Fred Kent’s impact:

According to Project for Public Spaces: “Today, Fred is applying his community organizing skills to lead a global placemaking movement that is connecting and supporting public space innovators, advocates, and professionals across the globe. The movement has been fueled by a consistent flow of ‘transformative agendas’ from Fred, which Project for Public Spaces has turned into direct support for communities looking for change. Informing, and grounding, these ideas, Fred has facilitated thousands of community-based projects that have demonstrated a new paradigm for shaping public spaces, including leading ongoing transformations of high profile places from Houston to Harvard Yard, Perth Cultural Centre to Downtown Detroit. Fred has made his passion for placemaking contagious with hundreds of keynotes, ranging from half a million at Earth Day 1990, to a room full of leaders at the World Bank. Perhaps his biggest impact is building the capacity of hundreds of local placemaking organizations, and city-wide placemaking campaigns, and from Cape Town to Kuala Lumpur, San Diego to Mississauga.”

However, many if not most cities and downtowns are struggling these days, and the problem is that most have become quite attractive places — but they have emptied out, as people work from home, companies downsize and businesses flee central city business districts for suburban locations or simply close their doors.

So, as helpful as placemaking has been in creating attractive urban spaces, it may not be the answer to solving the dilemma that cities now face — empty office buildings, vacant retail spaces and a feeling that once vibrant downtowns have become ghost towns.

How does retail thrive? Design for women.

In the terminology of academic research, placemaking is “necessary but not sufficient.” A few years ago, I co-authored a book entitled “Design Downtown for Women — Men Will Follow.” Our research showed that women are the most important demographic group for a city to succeed. Women make or influence over 80% of retail, dining, residential and healthcare decisions. Placemaking (or at least, place maintenance) is very important in attracting and keeping women as customers, visitors, business owners and residents.

But what do women consider the most hated thing about coming downtown? Parking, especially parking garages, which one woman in our survey described as “dull, dirty, dark and dangerous.” Second on the list of major dislikes was the absence of clean safe public restrooms. Planners should be paying attention to these gripes before adding planters and decorative lighting.

Rick Reinhard, a veteran of downtown revitalization, quotes another veteran who helped author a book called “Centralized Retail Management.” Our friend Jim Cloar says that the problem is not “placemaking” but is “place management.”

Years ago, when the International Downtown Association was trying to help its members compete with the growing shopping mall phenomenon, we asked, “what did mall developers know and do that we in the downtown world were not doing?” The answer was relatively straightforward: There was one owner, and that owner was responsible for managing the center. That meant efficient, high-quality maintenance, coordinated marketing (every tenant paid a fee) and a tenanting practice and policy that supported “companion retailing” — in other words, recruiting and placing tenants strategically.

The problem every downtown has that makes it different from the malls is multiple ownership of properties. And the way man downtowns have addressed this is a mechanism called Business Improvement Districts, or BIDs. These BID organizations try to replicate the effectiveness and efficiency of malls by providing centralized management, marketing and maintenance.

And while BIDs have generally done an acceptable job of public space maintenance and placemaking, where they seem to be lacking is overall management and marketing.

Multiple owners of properties make coordinated management a difficult task. BIDs usually need to craft a “cooperation agreement” in which property owners agree to turn over some business recruiting responsibilities to the BID; need to offer concessions and incentives, such as reduced or free rent or tenant improvements; and need to agree to engage a topflight marketing firm to develop a unified brand and programs such as hospitality training for employees.

This requires a new paradigm, a way of seeing downtown as an entity, and the city as being a place where sufficient resources — talent, financing, training — exist. This means abandoning the typical Chamber of Commerce “Drop an ad in Site Selection magazine” approach to business recruiting. It means “growing your own” as Dr. Bob Meeder in Pittsburgh has done for years, and Dan Gilbert in downtown Detroit has been doing recently.

Many years ago, when I was active in managing downtown parking, we used to say, “People don’t come downtown because it is a great place to park.” We are discovering that people don’t come downtown (or locate their business in downtown) because it has nice sidewalks, pretty flowers or decorative lighting. And they certainly don’t come downtown because it has bike lanes or bus lanes.

Customers will come downtown for a great restaurant, a destination retail or a well-managed office building at a reasonable price with responsive management. People will choose to live downtown if there are other people around, places to go and things to do. Placemaking is part of the mix, but it clearly is not the answer to restoring the economic health to our downtowns. This will take, to use a football phrase, the “hard blocking and tackling” that overall “place management” implies. And this means the existence of a downtown management organization that understands how businesses work.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Hill & Lake Press

Holidays on Hennepin: A Monthlong Celebration of Uptown’s Reopening

Holidays on Hennepin will brighten the corridor from Nov. 28 to Jan. 1 with lights, events, and a business passport program celebrating the long-awaited reopening of Hennepin Avenue South.

October 25, 2025

Help Hill & Lake Press Carry Its Legacy Into Our 50th Year

As Hill & Lake Press nears its 50th anniversary, we’re inviting readers to help preserve nearly five decades of local history — supporting digitization, small businesses and the next generation of community journalism in Minneapolis’ lakes district.

October 25, 2025

Letters to the Editor

Community voices weigh in on the future of Minneapolis — from Uptown revitalization and park stewardship to setting the record straight on DFL leadership and supporting pragmatic, results-driven candidates for City Council and Park Board.

October 25, 2025

Wishing For Snow 

As another chaotic election season collides with an unseasonably warm fall, gratitude feels complicated. Between politics, climate change and human suffering, maybe the best we can do this Thanksgiving is find small moments of hope — and wish for snow.

October 25, 2025

‘Minneapolis for the Many’ PAC: Issues Apology to Local Landlord

The progressive PAC Minneapolis for the Many was forced to publicly retract and apologize after falsely labeling Minneapolis landlord Jim Rubin a “negligent landlord.” The group admitted its claims were untrue and acknowledged Rubin’s work to preserve older buildings and maintain naturally occurring affordable housing — a rare reversal in the middle of an already heated election cycle.

October 25, 2025

Temple Israel Defaced Again, Less Than a Year After First Incident

In a disturbing repeat of last year’s vandalism, Temple Israel was defaced again — this time with Hamas-linked graffiti on the second anniversary of the Oct. 7 attacks. Community leaders swiftly condemned the act as a hate crime, while police and the FBI launched an investigation into the antisemitic messages.

October 25, 2025
See all posts